GTM engineering, built as Claude Code subagents.
Pipeline hygiene, ICP discovery, RFP response, CRM cleanup. All versioned in your repo, all trained on TVA.
Every subagent we build ships with a CLAUDE.md, a TVA rubric, and version history in your repo. Your team can read, modify, and extend anything we deploy. No black boxes. No vendor lock-in.
Ten services. Each one scoped independently. Start with one. Expand when the first one ships pipeline.
The services.
Questions.
Do we need to be using Claude Code already?
No. We set it up with you. Every engagement starts with a CLAUDE.md we write for your team and ends with a handoff session that trains your operators to modify the subagents we built.
Can we pick one service or do we need the full stack?
Pick one. Each service is scoped independently. Most teams start with pipeline hygiene or ICP discovery and expand from there once the first subagent is running.
What does a typical GTM engineering engagement cost?
Subagent builds typically run $15K-$75K depending on scope. Retainers for ongoing engineering start at $6K/mo. No hourly billing. No seat licenses.
Further reading.
- Claude Code for GTM teams: a practitioner's guideThe shape of a GTM Claude Code repo: where subagents live, how they read CRM data, how CLAUDE.md gates output. Plus the four most-shipped subagents in 2026.
- How to write a CLAUDE.md for your revenue teamA working template for a revenue-team CLAUDE.md. ICP block, voice rules, banned phrases, signal scoring rubric, and the data the subagents are allowed to touch.
- AI for GTM in 2026: what shipped, what stalled, what to actually buildThree years into the AI GTM hype cycle, the receipts are in. AI SDRs collapsed. Generic copilots got ignored. The teams that actually moved pipeline shipped Claude Code subagents in their own repos.